It seems better to buy a new house and take out a mortgage before retirement (which will never be fully repaid)

Forums

  • This topic is empty.
Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #84139 Reply
    Kim

      I prefer to at least have a primary residence paid off, the sooner the better. Having to pay for anything, including a roof over your head, affects your cash flow.

      #84140 Reply
      David

        Paranoia is expensive.

        #84141 Reply
        Dion

          The last thing I would ever want would be a paid off primary house.

          Cash flow sets us free not equity.

          And if I wanted equity I would prefer paid off rentals. Since the primary home gets a better interest rate.

          Suggested: Is there a general knowledge of when house prices should be going down?

          #84142 Reply
          Andrea

            To each, their own. Do what lets you sleep at night.

            #84143 Reply
            Dion

              You can’t take our a mortgage that will never be repaid, they will only give you up to your working life pension age…

              #84144 Reply
              David

                Cash ain’t gonna save you if SHTF.

                We just bought a modest house for cash and we are excited that we won’t haemve a 7.5% mortgage or that I’ll be a slave to a high paying job. We did the big house with a payment thing and it was stressful to us making that $2500 payment every month and then HOA fees and the higher everything that comes with a bigger house….and that was at a 3% rate.

                Now I could go work at Starbucks or Home Depot 20hrs a week for a few years and we’d be OK.

                You can check also: My biggest goal is saving for a house

                #84145 Reply
                Nicholas

                  I am in the no debt camp. Going into retirement with all debt paid off relieves potential worries. I also would not want to generate extra taxes by needing to cash in investments for house payments. I do appreciate this is a personal choice.

                  #84146 Reply
                  Suzanne

                    For me… having the literal security of a “roof over my head” in the late stage of my life is much preferable to any return that I could gain by investing this same amount. We tend to not see the reality of old age which might certainly include an unwillingness to move from place to place which renting could create.

                    I’m a nomad at heart and live international but I suspect as I get closer to my 80’s I would want to stay put.

                    If anything, a reverse mortgage would make more sense if I don’t care about it being “paid off” but don’t want the burden of having to have the cash to pay the loan or risk not owning the property.

                    Would you also like to explore: My husband and I are trying to weight pros and cons of selling our house

                    #84147 Reply
                    Tamara

                      I like having no house payment, but if I have to, I’ll consider a reverse mortgage to access equity. You can also tap that equity in other ways. A house payment also affects cash flow.

                      #84148 Reply
                      Laurel

                        Completely agree. Plus with the tax incentives, you can’t lose! Check out Ric Edelman – he’s an amazing award-winning financial planner that recommends the same thing. It sometimes feels like I’m making a mistake, but then I go back and read his books and few better about it!

                        #84149 Reply
                        Shelly

                          I did something similar. I prefer to have multiple streams of money and I’m getting more from high yield savings accounts than my mortgage interest costs.

                          I absolutely did not want to be house poor.

                          I do pay extra every month and did a 15 year mortgage.

                          #84150 Reply
                          Jule

                            It depends on how much money you have. Some people would prefer to have less expenses due to low income. Others don’t mind having a mortgage because they gave more than enough assets to cover for their expenses and prefer to have the money invested.

                            #84151 Reply
                            Jessica

                              That’s one way to look at it. The other way is to have a paid off house, if property taxes go up, you just have that, not a mortgage. These two ways of financial advice have been around a very very long time.

                              For me, I would rather start my retirement with no mortgage, or owe very little on the mortgage. But you can always buy a house after retirement too. My dad and his wife bought a different house and he was 82 and she 79.

                              There are always HELOC and reverse mortgages too. Do what works for ya.

                            Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
                            Reply To: Reply #84139 in It seems better to buy a new house and take out a mortgage before retirement (which will never be fully repaid)
                            Your information:




                            Spread the love